The morning after…

27 03 2009

l3648873

I heard MacT talk about a four bad minutes in the 2nd period cost them this game.  The Coyotes had them hemmed in and got 3-4 chances a couple times and that sunk his team.  Maybe we should wonder why they didn’t come out like a house on fire in the first.  I don’t know what team that our coach watches, but that wasn’t a desperate effort.  Not even close.

In a must win game against a non playoff team, the Oilers were flat.  Either the coach has an inability to get these guys fired up, or they are playing to get him fired.  One of the two.

Hopefully tonight, they are fired up on their own, because I don’t think our coach can get any more out of them than he already has.





Style points….zero.

25 03 2009

Red Wings Oilers Hockey

With my Novice team in the finals, I didn’t get to watch all of the game.  I predicted an Oiler 3-2 final, although expecting victory, I was not surprised.  Apparently, reading over at Lowetide in the comments of the game section, Dennis pointed out that Gagner took the late draw that caused a goal.

I know I am only a first year Novice head coach, but with a few minutes left, if I am in my own zone, I do not put my weakest players out there in a game where I am either struggling to hang on, or fighting to win.

Sam Gagner has a 43.3 face-off win percentage on the year.  Both Brodziak and Horcoff are substantially better.  Since I didn’t see the game, I don’t know what the shifts leading up to the faceoff was, nor do I know for sure whether it came off an icing and Gagner had to take the draw.  Either way, this team plays a passive game.  A very passive game.

Take a look at these stats.

PP: 22nd

PK: 27th

Shots for: 29th

Shots against: 25th

Win% trailing after 1st: 24th

Not only that, but our face offs are 26th in the league.  We don’t have the puck, we don’t pursue the puck, we don’t win the puck, we don’t carry the puck.  We don’t play an offensive style, we don’t aggressively play the game when we are ahead, we fight for a tie and a late winning goal, or to get to OT and get a loser point or fortunate win.

Hopefully the system changes.  The playing personnel changes, but the coaches seem to consistently coach them into a grinding style, which must be tiring after a while.  Ask Hemsky.





I hate hockey, I love hockey, I am not sure…

24 03 2009

matt-borutski-minor-hockey1

This is a hard post to write.   I was ready to call it a day.  All I could think about was how my pass time, my passion (Outside my work and family) had been bastardized to the point where the mere thought of it (Hockey itself) disgusted me.

I suppose I will have to paint a picture.  I was a smoker, out of shape, but at 32 decided to give up the habit, get in shape.  What better way to do that then to join a recreational hockey team and get back to my roots.  (I grew up on the ice at the outdoor rink my Dad managed)  So I joined a league, and it didn’t work out, but a couple years later, I joined a pretty good hockey team. (Called the Xtreme Hockey Club…go figure)

We played together for 8 seasons summer and winter, and won the title every season that we were together.  But the seasons took their toll, and with more young bucks coming in, I was feeling like my age and slow down meant that I just didn’t have the “jam” to continue as a player.  I retired from playing for the time being.

But, I couldn’t just not be involved in hockey, I still needed to be in shape.  The league had been advertising for referees for a couple seasons.  I thought..hey, skating, a few bucks, what the heck, it could be fun.  Not only that, my 7 year old was starting hockey, and I could coach and juggle the two.  Was going to be a fun winter.

A funny thing happened on the way to the fun winter…hockey players.  Men’s recreational hockey players.

Don’t get me wrong, I met a lot of great people playing rec hockey.  I met my best man playing rec hockey.  Until you ref recreational hockey, you have no idea what kind of animal they are.  I started reffing in October, and the amount of abuse that hockey players put on officials, is unreal.  Some real examples…

-Puck takes funny bounce off boards and hits my skate and player calls me a ****ing idiot.

-My partner waves off an icing and a player goes on a tirade how I am a ****ing moron.

-After a game giving a player three penalties, he suggest I keep my head up because he will take my teeth out next game. (And made it a point to say he was serious.)

-I wave an icing (100% sure it was the correct call) and the resulting breakaway scores.  The next face off,  losing player gets the puck, looks at me, down at the puck, back at me and takes a full slapshot that hits me in the leg.

Obviously I can penalize the infractions, but why does someone want this job?  I see why they have to advertise for referees…

After the last incident,  I had had enough.  This game sucks.  The players suck, and as far as I am concerned, I will only ref this year, and never again.  I don’t want to play it, I don’t even want to watch it on TV, or highlights.  I am disgusted at this game and the players that play it.  I couldn’t care a less if the NHL folded and all ‘Nucks, ‘Oil, ‘Habs, ‘Sens fans could cry in their beers and it wouldn’t matter to me.  TSN.ca is off my bookmarks.  I didn’t check a score for a week.  I left some of my fantasy leagues…  I will ref until the end of the season, but every drive to the rink is tempered with a lack of enthusiasm.  Not only is it just a job, it is now hard work.

But, I still have committments.  I am the head coach of my son’s Novice team.  We still have a season to finish.

It was actually quite funny, the coaching thing.  I intended to be an assistant coach.  I am a busy guy.  When the director phoned and asked me to be the Head coach, although I liked the idea, I travel with business, I have 5 kids, it is quite a committment.  Obviously I didn’t think that there was another candidate by what the director said because I took the job.  He even asked me to help with evaluations.

When my son went to the evaluation, he could barely stand up on his skates. (So did many others)  We went through the process, and my son ended up on a team in one of the lower Novice divisions.  When I got the team, 80% could barely skate, and maybe one had played organized hockey.  I didn’t even know if I could coach them.  I am probably better off suggesting when Staios loses his man and causes a goal than how to stop with two feet.   Could I take my hockey knowledge and break it right down to the basics?  I don’t generally think basically.

Well, we start working on it, lose our first two, then we get hammered in our third game 10-1.  It could be a long season.  But the kids are willing, and I am committed…so we work, and we work hard.  Last place team in the first round of Novice in our division at 2-6-0.  There is improvement, because the two wins are at the end of the round and the kids are starting to get it.  Best players start playing like best players, goalie settles down and because solid.  In the second round, they turn it up a notch, and go 5-1-0.  We might just have something here.

I get the call that we have been moved up a division.  “What the ****?”  We had one good win and all the rest were one or two goal victories.  Our goal differential was 11?  There is a team above us that didn’t move up that had no losses and a better goal differential.  Minor hockey is stupid, the directors are stupid….they are all stupid.  Hockey is stupid.  I call whoever I can, this is nuts.  Sadly, every avenue is shut down.  No one cares, that is just the way it is.  I am pissed, the parents are pissed.  Well, be a good soldier and suck it up.

It gets worse though.  Early in the season, one of my players moves to Ontario.  I am down to 12 kids.  Over Christmas, I play several games with less than 10 skaters.  I call the director.  “Sorry, we can’t help you.  You don’t get any affiliates.”  We fight against better teams, somehow we compete with what we have….some games I look at the kids who are tired and tell them they have to stay on the ice and feel genuine regret.

They still fight, and not too bad, after the third round, 3-5-0 against stiffer competition.  Pretty good I think.  But then, it gets worse.  One of my kids has arthritic knees and doctors say she is going to have to quit sports.  One of my kids goes to Mexico on holidays.  The playoffs are almost here.  What the heck are we going to do?  The best we can do is six forwards and three defensemen.  The league has to see it my way.  I call around for help, but no one is listening.  “I know it is frustrating, but you have to get by.”

Game one of the playoffs (A two loss and out playoff system) didn’t go well.  A team we just lost to 5-1 near the end of the year is going to be tough to beat.  And they were better.  A 6-1 loss was on the table and looking like an end to the season might be soon in the cards.

Interesting what happens though.  I see the next team we play happens to be lower in the standings.  I don’t know how they organize it, but getting one little win before bowing out would be a moral victory.   I don’t really want to see them lose like this.  The next game before the game,  I talk all about effort and compete and go over with the kids what they have learned all year.  I ask each player one by one to tell me one thing they are going to do to be successful.  The start regurgitating everything they have been taught all year.  “Use the boards.”, “Be aggressive.”, “Play your positions.”, “Pass the puck.”

Oddly they don’t really play all that well compared to some games.  Maybe they feel defeated.  I already am pretty disallusioned at hockey, so if they did end up losing, the bright lining is that I am done with it.  But they do play well enough to win 4-1.  After every game, I always call the kids to the bench for three cheers and congratulate them win or lose.  But I call, and none of them come.  They all skate over to mob our little goalie.  I shrug and smile, because they are happy.

So we lose Sunday, but win Thursday, and so on to Saturday.  I look at the schedule again.  The team right above us in the standings.  Well, I don’t care how it got there, but that works for me, we should be in it.  Not only that, our player that is injured wants to sit on the bench with us.  For sure.

I think we should be competitive.  And we are.  A hard fought two two game goes into the final 3 minutes, and one of our best players goes and finds a way to slip one past the goalie.  We find a way to hang on to a slim victory.  The kids jump all over the goalie again.  Now we are looking at superstitions.  Little number 6 wears the same clothes to every game, we do the same speeches, and same lines.  Win Saturday, play Sunday.

Well, it looks as though nice while it lasted.  The team we lost 5-1 and 6-1 is our opponent next.  The speech is a little more animated.  It has to be about the fight in the dog, not the dog in the fight.  We aren’t the best or most talented team, but there are kids that couldn’t skate 6 months ago fighting their hardest along the boards to win it.

A lot of it is confidence, and they seem to have some now.  Close game, up one, tied, up one, and the late goal to clinch it against the team that beat us.  Our goalie decided he was going to stand on his little head and some timely goals brings these kids to the point of eruption.  Another great celebration against a team they were thinking they would lose to.  Win Sunday, play Monday.

I look again and somehow we have avoided the top two teams thus far, and we play the fourth place team.  A team we played well in the regular season.  After the first period, it looks like we are spent.  Down 2-0 and a lot of kids standing around.  We coaches chatter on the bench about they are skating harder than us, that we need a big play.  One of our players needs to make a big play.  We get the big play.  Our number 6 steals the puck and shoots it off the post and in.  After that goal the energy boost to the team is evident.   Another goal comes quickly and we own the play for the rest of the game.  We score two waved off goals.  One at the 2nd period buzzer, and one on a bad whistle.  They hold on to overtime.

In overtime for minor hockey it starts 5 on 5, then each minute you reduce one player per side all the way to 1 on 1 if necessary.  I try to match my players as best I can, giving them rest and working it so we aren’t deficient anywhere.  I arrange it so that when we are down to 2 on 2, our two best players (One is my boy.) are on the ice.  We play the first three to a draw, a couple close calls at either end.  But my line matching works so that my 2 on 2 line up is fairly rested and ready to go.  I only takes 30 seconds and my son dekes both players and puts a high shot in over the goalie.  The place erupts.  My assistant coach goes on the ice and throws my son in the air a few times with hugs, the kids mob the goalie.  I grab all the kids at centre and tell them to wave and point at their parents who are so proud, the parent roar in approval.

I love the game…for today anyways.





It is only one game, but a good one.

4 12 2008

2562330483_9671e5ec47

Well, he wasn’t sitting last night. The amount of one liners on messageboards and around the water coolers about Rob Schremp was astronomical.

“Excellent, he should get about 3:42 of ice time and will play on a line with Stortini and Joey Moss.” -guy at the office.

“This makes no sense. They don’t even have Scott Ferguson available to play the other wing.” – Lowetide

All funny stuff, although those of us that felt like Jani Rita wasn’t given a fair shake weren’t really laughing. But, I am sure that Craig MacTavish swallowed hard, closed his eyes, and committed himself to let Schremp play 10 minutes and some PP time on the 2nd line.

The official line was 1 assist, 1 shot, 2 PIM, 14:53. It exceeded my expectation. So did Schremp’s performance. It reckoned me back to watching Jason Spezza before he was sent to the minors in 2002. Spezza looked like a guy that couldn’t find defensive zone coverage with a compass and road map. Sure he could dangle, but if your guy is open, or you consistently bump into your own guys in your zone, you need to get a clue before being on the ice.

Up to this point, I feel like management’s handling of Robbie Schremp has been pretty good. I think Robbie Schremp’s attitude towards his development has been pretty good. I thought he was one of the better players on the the ice, forchecked well, positioned well, backchecked well.

Granted I thought there were times where he wasn’t exactly in the spot I thought he should be in, and times when I thought he looked like he was watching the play, but I give him a B+ for the game, and expect that if this is his level of play and he is committed to improving, then he isn’t the guy that gets sent back down, Liam Reddox is. (Or if one of our two GM’s gets off their duffs, a goalie goes out so he can stay.)





The ball will bounce into Tambellini’s court…IF he is running the show.

30 11 2008

oilernewgm3.jpg

Funny. This is a very telling picture as to what I was thinking when this post came to mind. Who’s call is it? Let’s just say that Mark Spector’s article in Sportsnet was very accurate and an unnamed veteran has suggested that a coaching change might be the best route to take after trade possibilities are looked at.

With Kevin Lowe in the background, the hiring of Tambellini, an outsider, as the GM, that would lend credence to the fact that Katz is not looking to perpetuate an old boys club that has emphasis on anything other than winning. That being said, Katz has been on record as referring to Lowe and MacT as friends. You find it a lot in business that people surround themselves with people they trust, and friends fall in that category.

Let me ask you a question….does the team look a bit stale to you? It gives off the impression to me, and sometimes a change in leadership can infuse a freshness that can spark a team.

I listened intently to the media scrum on 630 ched archives (Third link down) with the interview of Steve Tambellini. Thus far in 2008-09 he seems to have been eerily silent. Not a lot of talk with Tambo, not a lot of moves, seemingly in the background more than Bush is to Obama.

In the scrum, I sense that Tambellini is very politically correct, and talks as if they are a management team that he is part of, not the leader of. I get the sense that he feels like the coach is doing a reasonable job and that the players are the guys that should be held accountable for what is going on. Either that or it is the company line that he has been instructed to profess.

Until I see a move that gives the sense that Tambellini is running the show, this is still Kevin Lowe’s team and if that is the case, the coach leaving is the last selection on the list of multiple choices.





Coaching…motivation, a necessary evil?

27 11 2008

arbour01

Al Arbour was a master motivator. Herb Brooks also falls into the category along with Scotty Bowman and I am certain quite a few others.

I have heard the school of thought that Craig MacTavish shouldn’t have to motivate millionaire hockey players, that their paycheque should be motivation enough. That being said, why are all the greatest coaches of all time considered great motivators?

In Ken Dryden’s book, The Game, he cited this about Bowman…”Scotty Bowman is not someone who is easy to like…. Abrupt, straightforward, without flair or charm, he seems cold and abrasive, sometimes obnoxious, controversial but never colorful. He is not Vince Lombardi, tough and gruff with a heart of gold. His players don’t sit and tell hateful-affectionate stories about him…. He is complex, confusing, misunderstood, unclear in every way but one. He is a brilliant coach, the best of his time.” Canadiens star Steve Shutt put it this way: “You hated him 364 days years, and on the 365th day you got your Stanley Cup ring.”

When I watched the Oilers last night, I saw some pretty good players. I saw some skill and some pretty good plays. I thought that the goalie was pretty good, especially in close.

There was one thing that I thought was entirely missing was the willingness to compete at the highest level. This was Craig MacTavish’s quote last night.

“It’s clear the will was there,” he said. “We’re a tight group right now. In particular at home. The will and the try and all of those things based on effort are there. It’s just a lack of execution in some pretty critical areas of the game offensively.”

It may be odd to some, but I have a differing opinion as to how the game looked. Not that the Oilers were dogging it. It wasn’t a brutal effort. But it would be easy for anyone who took the time to watch the first half of the TSN double header to see that the losing team (Detroit) would have hammered either of the teams that were on the Rexall ice.

The puck pursuit was very good, the effort on every play was at a high level. But then again, that is the difference between contenders and pretenders.

I have always been someone who could take or leave Craig MacTavish. He seems to be able to teach certain players and get the most out of them. Most players like to play for him. He seems to be accountable.

On the other hand, he can’t coach skill very well, he can’t motivate players, and maximize their potential. Skill players do not flourish under MacTavish, which is probably why Tim Sesito and Liam Reddox are up. Brule and Schremp do not fall under the prototypical MacTavish player.

With the Oilers property as it sits, I would have the following…

Penner Horcoff Hemsky

Nilsson Cogliano Gagner

Moreau Schremp Cole

Brule Brodziak Stortini(And if you aren’t happy with Stortini, move him and call up Potulny)

MacIntyre

Souray Gilbert

Visnovsky Grebeshkov

Staios Smid

Strudwick

Garon/Roloson (Move one….and I am not concerened which.)

Deslauriers

Set your line up with your best players and go to war. Motivate them and get them fired up…because I am certain Oiler fans are tired of mediocrity….and part, a good part is on MacTavish, like it or not. Motivating is part of the job, and if you can’t do it, there are others who can.





A game of chicken…

26 11 2008

This isn’t Oiler related, but I wanted to talk about negotiations and how they work.  I was reading an article in Twincities.com that indicated that Wild GM Doug Risebrough had yet to communicate with Backstrom’s agent Don Baizley about a contract with Backstrom set to be an Unrestricted Free Agent on July 1.

In Sun Tzu’s Art of War, the art of listening is the key to a successful negotiation.  This episode is another example of poor negotiations.

If I were an NHL GM, which would of course be the dream job, I would have constant contact with the agents of my key players.  My goal would be to maintain my key core of players and then mix in complimentary players to be successful.  Why that doesn’t seem to work in Minnesota is a mystery to me with Gaborik almost a for sure exit and no contact with one of the best statistical goalies in the league.

There are 28 Unrestricted Free Agent goalies but 4-5 of them are legitimate starters for a team that wants to be a playoff contender.  A resurgent Khabibulin, Tim Thomas, Martin Biron, and Manny Legace.  If you want to sprinkle in guys that could be considered a potential starter, Dwayne Roloson, Manny Fernandez, and even Mathieu Garon might be on your list as someone you can sign on the cheap and let him run for a year or two.

Looking at the availables, none of them are more appealing than the guy you already have in house, so why would you not be talking with the agent a quarter of the way through the season?  I can’t see a back up plan (sorry for the pun) and for a team that seems to be fairly successful, they have a lot of question marks.

I think back to the Ryan Smyth negotiation, and I wonder if either Lowe or Meehan were thinking clearly and providing each other a clear understanding of position and negotiated in good faith for both parties.

Did they actually listen to each other?  Did the $100K mean that much to either party?  Was the offer of a no trade clause worth the $100K and should have been accepted?  Is Kevin Lowe such a hard line Megalomaniac that when he carves a line in the sand, no one should DARE try to get him off his position? (I tend to believe that Kevin Lowe is a “My way or the highway” sort of negotiator.

So GMs play chicken with Agents, Agents with GMs, and sometimes action or inaction changes the internal make of their team for years to come.  If this season doesn’t work out well for the Wild, they will certainly be falling a notch starting in 2009-10.





Sorry for delay…and O’byrned…..

25 11 2008

It’s been a while since I wrote…business travel and five kids really take it’s time.

A few quick hits….

The Maple Leafs will find that having Burke as their GM won’t be the insta-solution they are looking for.

Steen and Colaiacovo for Stempniak is a draw at best, and if Cola get’s healthy a Blues win.

Poor Ryan O’byrne….but you would think it was a playoff game the way he was treated by the fans. Alas poor Yorick. We have all made a bonehead move on the ice. I can even remember pushing one into my own net in Peewee. But nothing was more definitive than this one….

or more painful than this one…

Hopefully my time is easier and more blogs soon to come….





Battle of Alberta…score one for the good guys…

18 10 2008

So far it seemed to click after FCP took two penalties to change the momentum in Game 2.  The legs started to move and the momentum followed.  In Game three of the Oilers season, the effort was pretty consistent for the whole affair.  Although the Oilers counted on three PP markers for the victory, they carried enough of the play that it was a solid effort throughout.

Cole-Horcoff-Hemsky (B+)  It looked better tonight.  Understanding where your teammates are is a big part of it.  Cole was using his body effectively and it looks like Hemsky is rushing with speed.  They were a solid part of the power play and rarely spent significant time in their own zone.

Nilsson-Cogliano-Gagner (A-) Nilsson looked good, very good.  It would have been better, but them being caught for the first goal against where they were hemmed in their own zone, and were out muscled.  Cogliano was solid and Gagner generated some chances. 

Moreau-Pisani-Penner (B+) Physical, sound defensively, and strong on the PK.  Penner skated better tonight, and they were dangerous five on five.  Although the stats don’t show it, they were good all night.

Pouliot-Brodziak-MacIntyre (B-)

The only thing you ask of your fourth line is don’t get scored against, be a bit physical and generate energy.  The only player on this line I really liked was Brodziak.  MacIntyre played next to none but was a contributing factor on the Moss goal.  With one hit between them, no points and -1 across the board, this line leaves a lot to be desired from the Stortini-Brodziak-Glencross line of last season.

Souray-Visnovsky (A)

What is not to like?  Four points, a great PP, and…oh noes…Souray is hurt.  Well, it was fun for the first three games.  Hopefully Souray isn’t out for any length of time with what was said a knee injury.  I was thinking shoulder would be bad…very bad.  Small consolation.  They were good in their zone, and great in the offensive zone.  This game is what we had been salivating for since the Visnovsky trade.

Gilbert-Grebeshkov (B)

Gilbert has been under performing.  Hopefully he starts progressing soon.  If Souray is out for any length of time he will need to step up.  Grebeshkov is in the Souray and Visnovsky calibre of play right now with Gilbert being one of the worst Oilers.

Staios-Strudwick (B+)

Staios had a slow start to the game but really turned it up in the 2nd half of the game.  Strudwick is still playing a solid simple game and within his comfort zone.  Also took the time to stand up for Visnovsky after the Giordano hit.  Nice work.

Jeff Deslauriers (B)

If not for two softies, it would have been better.  The kid was probably nervous and made some nice saves.  He sure is big in the nets, but is flexible and fast.  But all in all, a win is a win.

The team is 3-0 and the optimism still abounds.  And they have only played 4 or 5 really good periods out of 9.  If Souray is just banged up, then life is good.  If not, then time to reassess.





The day after the night before…

17 10 2008

After watching the first two games, well more accurately the first game and a half, one thing I noticed. They weren’t skating. Hemsky looked like Luc Robitaille in slow motion, the kid line looked more like the Stars Grumpy Old Men (What a great line….wasn’t that Muller, Keane and MacLean?) and Penner’s feet looked more like cement blocks than a guy that was going to be better stronger and faster than last year.

One thing is for certain though, this team will be exciting to watch at both ends. The kids can get hemmed in their own zone pretty easily without the grit to get out sometimes. Cole-Horcoff-Hemsky have zero for chemistry thus far.  Cole being moved to the left wing from his natural right wing is probably a factor, and Hemsky’s very average performance is also a large contributor.  Horcoff seems to be the most advanced on the team as far as performance goes.

So here are your team grades for Game two:

Cole-Horcoff-Hemsky (B-)

If it wasn’t for Horcoff’s goal and Cole and Hemsky getting assists on Visnovsky’s game winner this grade would be worse.  They aren’t a cohesive unit, and there was no sustained pressure.  Hemsky, despite double shifting at times was rarely dangerous and the worst of the three.

Gagner-Cogliano-Nilsson (B-)

Too much time spent hemmed in their own zone, not enough pressure in the offensive zone and poor decision making.  Nilsson looking marginally dangerous, and was backchecking well.  Cogliano was very average, and didn’t utilize his speed much at all.  Gagner although the team leader in SOG, was the worst of the three, but at least was not afraid to put the puck at the net.

Moreau-Pisani-Penner (B)

At one point I saw Penner put his head down after a couple slow strides as if he was trying to convince himself to skate hard.  Penner did make a couple nice defensive plays, and it looks as though progress is being made.  Moreau was physical and played well, and Pisani ended up being better in the dot than expected.  They seemed to be the only line that was effective for the first half of the game, and continued in the 2nd half as the rest of the team got their legs.

Pouliot-Brodziak-MacIntyre(Nilsson and Hemsky) (B-)

Generally they were not effective for the first period and a half much like the rest of the team.  MacIntyre was fine for what was asked of him, he played only a few minutes, but that was enough for the Ducks to not take much in liberties.  I am not a Pouliot fan, but he does seem to be developing into a bottom six NHLer.  He and Brodziak did come on in the third period, and it could be possible that MacIntyre being on the line hurt their transition game.  Once Big Mac was on the bench and the third linemate could contribute, the line seemed much more effective.

Souray-Visnovsky (B+)

Both had a goal and one was the game winner.  Defensively five on five there are some concerns, but offensively if these two stay together, points will come.  Souray was even pinching on the rush five on five with a one goal lead.(Not sure if I think that is good or bad).

Gilbert-Grebeshkov (B)

If I grade these separately, Grebeshkov gets and A- and Gilbert a C+.  Gilbert is handling the puck like a grenade and Grebs is calm cool and efficient.  Hopefully Tom Gilbert improves, or we might see Staios back in the top four.

Strudwick-Staios (B-)

Strudwick looks a lot better than I thought he would, but then again, I believe that Smid is a guy that should be playing and developing.  Staios looked slow but reasonably steady.  If he gets his ice limited to some easier minutes, he should be OK.

Mathieu Garon (A-)

Probably should have had Huskins shot but other than that, fast, solid and kept the Oilers in it until their legs were under them.  A very good performance.  Good positionally and his rebound control really impresses me.  Suck on that Bruce Dowbiggen.

Team (B-)

They need to start skating for 60 minutes.  If they do, you can see the difference.  They also look a little disorganized, with several new faces unclear of how to play the system.  That will take time, but it is nice to start 2-0.