Archive for the ‘Oilers’ Category

On April 21, the first big move of the offseason began. Although there were precursors to the rebuild at the deadline, Steve Staios, Lubomir Visnovsky and Denis Grebeshkov were shipped off at the deadline bringing in Ryan Whitney, Aaron Johnson and a couple of 2nd rounders to show. All very solid moves for a team that decided to get younger, and culture change began.

Kevin Pendergast was excused of his duties and the first step to a new reborn franchise was complete. This was a completely necessary action since Pendergast performance in the last 20 years could only be categorized as barely passable.

The draft has been poor until Stu MacGregor took over, the minor league teams have either been non existent or performing poorly.

His drafting record is a who’s who of ineffectiveness. Consider that he was still on staff for all the debacles that occured since 1990, his charge of the draft began in 2000. I personally don’t subscribe to the “How many NHLers were drafted” and how many games they have played. Just because they were your best option to play doesn’t mean they were effective players. The blind Russian Tractor Boy, Alexei Mikhnov. Jesse Who? and Pouliot vs. Parise some of the most notable gaffes.

Steve Tambellini set the wheels in motion with this firing, and much more to come as the offseason wore on. This was a solid move.

Mission Statement

Posted: November 19, 2009 in General, NHL, Oilers, Uncategorized

The Edmonton Oilers are a business.  As a businessman myself, there is always a hierarchy in any corporate structure.  The strange thing about corporate structure is that you generally will have a clearly defined Mission Statement.

Personally, I don’t know what the Oilers’ Mission Statement is, or how they conduct their business, but let’s try to examine what it could be, and what the team is and see if we can find a correlation within. (A nice big shout out to Lowetide, whose Letter to Katz was the inspiration to this blog entry)

A good mission statement indicates what the purpose of the organization is.  What is the Oilers’ reason for being?  Historically what was it?  How has present ownership changed the mission statement from the previous organization.

In the Pocklingtonian Era, there was only one part of the mission statement that mattered.  “The Edmonton Oilers organization will be built to win the Stanley Cup, as soon and as often as possible.”  Thus within a short five years, and then five times by 1990, the team had fulfilled their mission statement and was a model franchise, although some levels of complacency and other factors exhibited pressure on the organization to change this fact.

Backlash against Pocklington, and escalating salaries turned the Mission Statement into.  “A team looking to continue our legacy in spite of economic and social factors to the contrary.”   Economically the team couldn’t continue as the preeminent franchise in the league due to a saggy Canadian Dollar, escalating salaries, and partial failure of the team to replenish after their first group of young stars were long traded away.  Complacency be thy name.

By the late 90s, the Mission Statement must have been “A team looking to survive in the NHL and poor ownership.”  Cal Nichols and the EIG took over in 1998.

Executing a survival plan to keep the team in Edmonton, Nichols and the large consortium would have probably considered something to the effect of “An organization ingrained in the fabric of the city designed to provide entertainment, prestige, and partnership in the community.”  The Oilers were “saved” so that Edmonton could still have an NHL team, and the community could still have one of the shiniest jewels in their history.  Dealing with too many owners, team patriarch Glen Sather left to Broadway, and Kevin Lowe, tied to the team’s history forever took over.  For the few seasons that Sather was still around after Pocklington, the team wasn’t successful, but for a short period, many in the community were likely just happy to have a team.

Since the Lowe era began in 2000, the Mission of “Competitive while surviving economically.” would be the primary thought.  Just make it to the CBA, and maybe we can get a league wide economic system that would stop the team from barely being competitive, to competitve, and gosh darn it, maybe champion again.  Who knows, maybe the “rush” of the new economic order excited the franchise to have one season of “Infuse talent into the team to be as competitive as possible.”  Adding Pronger, Peca, and later Spacek and Samsonov to a team that provided a great run although unlikely since the Oilers were actually fortunate that they could back into the playoffs due to Canuck ineptitude.

Since Prongergate and the plentiful nicknames heaped on the gap toothed one, the team has been struggling for identity.  The Mission Statement perpetually blurred.  Is this team rebuilding?  Are we competitive?  Does the team continually look to land a big fish but end up hungry because of its own blindness?  It seems lately the team has pursued and pursued the highest of talents and come away empty.  The Mission Statement “To acheive success by acquiring elite talent either by free agency or trade.” would be more apropos.

The funny thing is, that regardless, we cheer, we follow, we watch, we buy PPV, and attend games for a team without clear and concise leadership and identity.  With our new owner, the team was supposed to have new found direction and leadership and a Mission Statement that we can all believe in.  The team economically is a license to print money, so unless Katz is one of those meddling owners with a play thing, the fan base wants the Mantra to become “To build a successful franchise worthy of their storied history.”  The disappointing part is that since Darryl Katz took over, there seems to be no steps taken in this regard.

Showdown in the West….

Posted: October 1, 2009 in General, NHL, Oilers, Uncategorized

valley web 1 Well, it is going to be a rootin’ tootin’ dust up in the West this year.  The predictions will be fast and furious, with so many teams in the mix, it could be an injury to the wrong player, or some outperformers stepping it up.  Teams with lots of depth exceding expectations, or stars falling flat on their faces.  Here are my standings predictions….and a more.

1.  San Jose.  The best in the west is still the best in the west.  No Cheechoo, No Michalek, but bring on the Heatley.   Not only that, when you need a top grinding centre, Manny Malhotra drops from the sky and signs for $700K.  Maybe a little light on depth on the blueline, but enough to keep them atop the standings.

2. Chicago.  Patrick “20 cent” Kane and Toews are going to improve.  Hossa to come, solid defense.  If Huet is just average they are top 4 in the West.   Adding John Madden is going to help on the defensive side of the ice.

3.  Vancouver.  By virtue of Division leaders ranking,  these guys won’t have more points than Detroit, but they will win their division.  Solid blueline additions, with Ehrhoff,  Schneider…could be the best group of 6 in the entire league.  Shirikov is a darkhorse for Rookie of the Year.  If they can score some goals, with Luongo and that blueline, they might make some noise come May.

4.  Detroit.  Always too good to fall very far.  Top echelon offense and two way players, Lidstrom and solid support on the back end.  It didn’t matter that Osgood was pedestrian all year.

5.  Columbus.  My surprise to do something this year and continue to advance as a franchise.  With the return of Brassard, a solid but underapreciated defense, great goaltending, this team will win games with Hitch at the helm.

6.  Calgary.  The devil to the south has another edition of a solid team.  Playoffs with their defense corps is almost a certainty.  Adding Jaybo is huge, a full year of Jokinen will help the offense, and that goofy looking guy in net is generally not too bad.

7.  Anaheim.  Solid enough to make the dance.  Top line as good as any in the league.  Questionable blueline after Niedermayer.  Great goaltending duo.  Might have some trouble keeping the puck out of their net because they looking to have some defensive definciency up front…but Carlyle is a crackerjack coach.

8.  Edmonton.  Either one in or one out.  Don’t see it much finishing more either way.  Quinn and Renney are enough to add at least three wins to this team.  Bounce back years by Cogliano and Gagner, and having Visnovsky for the full year should equate to a playoff spot.

9. St. Louis.  Could easily usurp the Oil for eigth spot.  Erik Johnson healthy, great group of young forwards, and solid tending.

10.  Los Angeles.  This is going to be another good team.  Good group of forwards, great combination of offense, defense and toughness on the back end.  A little experience and this team is going to start to make some waves.

11.  Nashville.  Starting to see a big drop off in talent.  Offensively will struggle.  Great defense and goaltending will keep them in a lot of games.  Pekka Rinne is going to have a very good year.

12.  Minnesota.  Pretty average forward group.  Decent defense.  Great goaltending.  They need to start acquiring some skill up front.  New coach, but will take time to find their new system.

13.  Dallas.  If Turco doesn’t bounce back, it will be very ugly.  Their defense isn’t good.  Their forwards are ok, but not enough for them to win tons of games.

14.  Colorado.  Blueline looks decent, but forward group is a long way from the Sakic, Forsberg, Hejduk days of old.  Duchesne is my favourite for rookie of the year.  Goaltending improves a bit, but going to be a long year in Denver.

15.  Phoenix.  No owner, no coach, no chance.

Could we? Should we?

Posted: August 28, 2009 in NHL, Oilers, Uncategorized

mikecomrie

Mike Comrie at $1.3 million.  That is the rumour.  Oilersnation.com first, then a non denial from Dan Tencer of Ched (Credit lowetide), and a Ritch Winter “no comment”.  Speculation that the Owner is involved in this potential move.  If you are asking me, this plan is half baked if I have ever seen it.  Unless…it is a precursor to something else.

If this is a move by itself in a vacuum, I hate it.  We have a “number 1” centre in Horcoff.  We have TWO number two centres in Gagner and Cogliano.  We have two number four centres in Pouliot and Brule.  We have small centres….out the ass.  We have small forwards, soft forwards, all over the place.  Comrie isn’t the second coming of Theoren Fleury. (Well apparently Theoren Fleury is the second coming of Theoren Fleury…but that is another blog.)

So what could the motivation be to add a small 2nd line centre?  Someone else moving?  Suggesting this is a precursor to Heatley is marginal at best.  There are no signs that there is a heartbeat in this deal laying on the operating table.  It looks dead.  Someone other than Heatley?  Well, rumours did kick around about Kessel (But my foggy memory thinks that might have been on Eklund so my comfort with its validity is not that great.) but even if that was true, adding TWO small centres isn’t exactly what the doctor ordered.
If we were talking Manny Malhotra, we would all be doing a bit of a happy dance.  Blair Betts?  Nice to get some help on the PK.  But Mike Comrie?  Unless this has something else to it, it sucks as a move.  Period.

Ouch…

Posted: March 31, 2009 in NHL, Oilers

hockey-accidentAs a busy guy, I watch what I can, when I can.  I watched the first two periods of the Minnesota game.  You can give individual player grades, where you have some guys going and some guys not.  You can count chances here and there.

There is something that you can’t measure.  Passion.  This team has no passion.

There are a lot of people that suggest that these are millionaire hockey players that are getting paid to do their jobs, and they should be self motivated and committed to doing their job.  MacTavish also seems like a coach that doesn’t use his powers of persuasion to invoke a sense of urgency on a team with more than enough talent to make the playoffs.  So, maybe the coach shouldn’t have to motivate his players, but if he has to, then he has to.

Well, here are some examples of guys that might help get the job done.  (Well, you might need a time machine.)

1.  Scotty Bowman.

“I was in St. Louis and had given the guys a curfew,” Bowman said recently, going back to the beginning of his NHL coaching career, in the late ’60s. “I didn’t do a bed check or anything, and I had guys that tramped a lot. So once I gave the bellman at the hotel we were at $10 and a hockey stick. He stood in the lobby, and when the players rolled in at one, two in the morning, he had the guys sign the stick. Every guy who cut curfew, his name was on that stick in his own handwriting. I just walked into the room the next day and held it out. ‘Look what I’ve got.”

2. Herb Brooks.

“When it came to hockey, he was ahead of his time,” Ken Morrow said. “All of his teams overachieved because Herbie understood how to get the best out of each player and make him part of a team. And like everyone who played for him, I became a better person because I played for Herb Brooks.”

3. Badger Bob Johnson.

I remember it like it was yesterday. It was the second game of an important two-game series against Herb Brooks’ Minnesota Golden Gophers at the old Williams Arena on the UM campus during the 1978-79 season. The game was tied going into the third period and both teams were still in their respective locker rooms in the bowels of Williams Arena – each refusing to take the ice first before the start of the third period. The bitter rivalry between Brooks and Johnson was legend and often manifested itself in ways beyond simple gamesmanship in order to establish even the slightest of edges.

Suddenly, there was a loud pounding on our locker room door, and I when I opened it, there stood referee Medo Martinello, hands on hips, and barking this command to the visiting coach: “Let’s go Bob – take the ice.” Johnson grunted and nervously ran his hand over his face from top to bottom as he often would when out on the spot.

“Just one minute, Medo,” said Johnson as he closed the door.

Frustrated, Johnson moved to address his players one more time before acquiescing to the demands of the WCHA officiating staff to take the ice before Minnesota. But just before he did, I reminded him of a conversation we had earlier in the week over breakfast at Mickey’s in Madison.

“Clockwise,” I said. “Let’s take the ice first, but let’s skate clockwise around the rink instead of counter-clockwise.”

Earlier in the week at Mickey’s we had talked about the phenomenon of all skaters’ insistence of skating counter-clockwise and never clockwise around the rink – even at public skating. Johnson dismissed all of the conventional theories and just intuitively knew there was something more to it than simply being right-handed or left-handed. So my assignment for the week was to find out why 100 percent of all skaters prefer to skate in a counter-clockwise direction.

This was a prime example of Johnson’s deep need to know about every aspect of his passion. And sure enough after speaking with several physics professors at the UW as well as a good friend and former U.S. Pairs coach Pieter Kollen in Colorado Springs it became clear that Johnson was right. It was the gravitational pull of the earth that caused skaters to skate, hurricanes to swirl, and toilets to flush in a counter-clockwise direction north of the equator and the opposite direction south of the equator.

Without even responding to me, Johnson moved to the middle of the locker room and said: “Each of you knows what you have to do to win this game. Now let’s go out there and do it.”

With that, the team collectively jumped to its feet and headed for the door. But before starting goalie Roy Schultz could lead the Badger team out, Johnson quickly pulled him aside and told him to lead the Badgers around the rink “clockwise.” Schultz was a simple farm boy from Regina, Saskatchewan who followed Johnson’s instructions without question and lead the Badgers out onto the Williams Arena ice in a clockwise direction without really understanding why.

A few moments later, the Gophers started to make their way to the ice all puffed up for the third period, then suddenly as a group, slowed to a stand-still and stared out onto the ice confused at what they saw. It was amazing to watch as the Gophers reluctantly and uncomfortably took the ice to start the third period.

The Badgers ultimately won the game but who is to say for certain whether or not taking the ice clockwise had anything to do with it or not. Afterall, Brooks ultimately led that Gopher team to the NCAA Championship later that year.

4. Al Arbour.

One day the Islanders showed up at a practice facility to find that an egg had been placed in each of their lockers.”What Al told the players was, ‘If you carried that egg with you last night when you played, you wouldn’t have broken it because not one of you touched a soul,” Torrey recalled.

Torrey recalls that Arbour was always “fussing and fuming” about losses, but the next day he would come in smiling because he would have a plan.

He remembers the Islanders had played poorly on the road in Los Angeles and Arbour had essentially said that his team had “gone to the dogs.” He said they had played like dogs.

The next day they flew to Vancouver and Arbour asked Torrey to go for a walk as he sorted out what was going wrong. On their journey, they stopped at a general store, and Arbour spied a bag of dog biscuits sitting on the counter. He bought them.

“I said Al if you’re hungry we can go have lunch with the players,” Torrey said, laughing at the memory. “But he had a plan.”

Arbour went to the dining area where players were having lunch and he told the waiters to put a plate of biscuits on each table instead of dessert. Arbour and Torrey waited around the corner to monitor the reaction.

“And I remember Al peeked around the corner, and he turned back laughing, ‘can you believe that Stefan Persson just ate one,’” Torrey recalls.  Then Arbour and Torrey heard all of the players barking like dogs, and Arbour knew that he had made his point and had a good laugh at the same time.

5. Toe Blake.

The mastermind behind the on-ice exploits of the likes of “The Rocket”, Jean Beliveau, Doug Harvey, Bernard Geoffrion and Jacques Plante, Blake always knew which buttons to push. Wearing his trademark fedora wherever he went, he had a knack for keeping his talented group of superstars and future Hall of Famers focused and hungry year in, year out. While they could easily have become complacent, Blake’s Canadiens were instead the most driven and determined team in the NHL.

Now ask yourself if you feel the same way about our coach.  Is he a good NHL coach?  Well he isn’t Mario Tremblay.  But he isn’t good enough to get this team into the playoffs (Well, as of this moment.)  and that will be five misses, two first round losses, and one fortuitous finals appearance in eight seasons.  Wouldn’t a good coach do more with less?

He seems like a decent fellow, and a player’s coach (Unless you have lots of skill.) overall.  But if game 82 shows up and people aren’t shelling out sheckles for playoff ducats, then the Silver Fox has to bow out.  Period.

oilernewgm3.jpg

Funny. This is a very telling picture as to what I was thinking when this post came to mind. Who’s call is it? Let’s just say that Mark Spector’s article in Sportsnet was very accurate and an unnamed veteran has suggested that a coaching change might be the best route to take after trade possibilities are looked at.

With Kevin Lowe in the background, the hiring of Tambellini, an outsider, as the GM, that would lend credence to the fact that Katz is not looking to perpetuate an old boys club that has emphasis on anything other than winning. That being said, Katz has been on record as referring to Lowe and MacT as friends. You find it a lot in business that people surround themselves with people they trust, and friends fall in that category.

Let me ask you a question….does the team look a bit stale to you? It gives off the impression to me, and sometimes a change in leadership can infuse a freshness that can spark a team.

I listened intently to the media scrum on 630 ched archives (Third link down) with the interview of Steve Tambellini. Thus far in 2008-09 he seems to have been eerily silent. Not a lot of talk with Tambo, not a lot of moves, seemingly in the background more than Bush is to Obama.

In the scrum, I sense that Tambellini is very politically correct, and talks as if they are a management team that he is part of, not the leader of. I get the sense that he feels like the coach is doing a reasonable job and that the players are the guys that should be held accountable for what is going on. Either that or it is the company line that he has been instructed to profess.

Until I see a move that gives the sense that Tambellini is running the show, this is still Kevin Lowe’s team and if that is the case, the coach leaving is the last selection on the list of multiple choices.

Coaching…motivation, a necessary evil?

Posted: November 27, 2008 in NHL, Oilers

arbour01

Al Arbour was a master motivator. Herb Brooks also falls into the category along with Scotty Bowman and I am certain quite a few others.

I have heard the school of thought that Craig MacTavish shouldn’t have to motivate millionaire hockey players, that their paycheque should be motivation enough. That being said, why are all the greatest coaches of all time considered great motivators?

In Ken Dryden’s book, The Game, he cited this about Bowman…”Scotty Bowman is not someone who is easy to like…. Abrupt, straightforward, without flair or charm, he seems cold and abrasive, sometimes obnoxious, controversial but never colorful. He is not Vince Lombardi, tough and gruff with a heart of gold. His players don’t sit and tell hateful-affectionate stories about him…. He is complex, confusing, misunderstood, unclear in every way but one. He is a brilliant coach, the best of his time.” Canadiens star Steve Shutt put it this way: “You hated him 364 days years, and on the 365th day you got your Stanley Cup ring.”

When I watched the Oilers last night, I saw some pretty good players. I saw some skill and some pretty good plays. I thought that the goalie was pretty good, especially in close.

There was one thing that I thought was entirely missing was the willingness to compete at the highest level. This was Craig MacTavish’s quote last night.

“It’s clear the will was there,” he said. “We’re a tight group right now. In particular at home. The will and the try and all of those things based on effort are there. It’s just a lack of execution in some pretty critical areas of the game offensively.”

It may be odd to some, but I have a differing opinion as to how the game looked. Not that the Oilers were dogging it. It wasn’t a brutal effort. But it would be easy for anyone who took the time to watch the first half of the TSN double header to see that the losing team (Detroit) would have hammered either of the teams that were on the Rexall ice.

The puck pursuit was very good, the effort on every play was at a high level. But then again, that is the difference between contenders and pretenders.

I have always been someone who could take or leave Craig MacTavish. He seems to be able to teach certain players and get the most out of them. Most players like to play for him. He seems to be accountable.

On the other hand, he can’t coach skill very well, he can’t motivate players, and maximize their potential. Skill players do not flourish under MacTavish, which is probably why Tim Sesito and Liam Reddox are up. Brule and Schremp do not fall under the prototypical MacTavish player.

With the Oilers property as it sits, I would have the following…

Penner Horcoff Hemsky

Nilsson Cogliano Gagner

Moreau Schremp Cole

Brule Brodziak Stortini(And if you aren’t happy with Stortini, move him and call up Potulny)

MacIntyre

Souray Gilbert

Visnovsky Grebeshkov

Staios Smid

Strudwick

Garon/Roloson (Move one….and I am not concerened which.)

Deslauriers

Set your line up with your best players and go to war. Motivate them and get them fired up…because I am certain Oiler fans are tired of mediocrity….and part, a good part is on MacTavish, like it or not. Motivating is part of the job, and if you can’t do it, there are others who can.

MATHIEU GARON

With all the pundits picking the Oilers as a playoff team, the look to our skilled youth, our improved and hopefully healthy defense, and the return of of our banged up leaders into the fold. Garon was drafted 44th overall by the Canadiens in 1996.

Garon actually played pretty well as a Hab. In 39 games played he had a 2.48 goals against average. Watching him as a Canadien, you thought he could be an NHL starter. The problem for Garon was timing. He was just coming into the NHL when Jose Theodore was having the best years of his career.

When he was shipped to LA with a 3rd rounder for Huet and Bonk who was acquired for a 3rd rounder so it was basically a Huet for Garon straight up swap. The lockout was a good year in the AHL for Garon, but the oddity I find in his career was the 2005-06 season in Los Angeles. It was his only year as an NHL starter and the numbers were not good on a pretty decent looking Kings squad. He was given the reigns again in 2006-07 but a groin injury and finger injury provided him with a season that was OK numbers wise but not a lot of games played. The Kings in their infinite wisdom figured that Labarbera’s excellent AHL season was enough to give him a shot at the starting job and the Oilers signed Garon in the offseason.

What we saw last season is probably a pretty good indicator of what the Edmonton Oilers have. A solid goaltender that might win you the odd game, won’t throw up too many bricks, and will be enough to tip a few scales to your side in the Shootout. (Although the expectation of repeat performance in the shootout is wishful thinking.) I think he will outperform last year because of a more mature team in front of him, as well as two veterans in Visnovsky and Souray that will be patrolling his blueline that were not there last year.

Projection: Starting goalie-trending upwards (65 games played 36 wins – 22 loss – 7 OT loss)

DWAYNE ROLOSON

Roli is in the last year of his contract and turns 39 in October. I am not sure what his off season training regimen is but it had better be in decent shape. I think that some team that is a contender would likely kick the tires on Roli after some of his salary was taken by the Oilers. The way the cap works they would only have to fit him in for the portion that they have to pay so if by chance they need an experienced back up, Christmas would be a time frame that would be more likely.

If Tambellini can find a dance partner, Roloson is as good as gone. With the three headed monster in net with three one way contracts, this is a huge negative for the team. When you have three guys in practice, it is uncomfortable. When you have to scratch a goalie for a game and put him in the press box, it is uncomfortable. Needless to say, if a partner existed already, the Oilers might have parted ways with Roloson. It might take a serious injury to a first string goalie elsewhere to accelerate the process, but rather than schadenfreude another team, let’s hope that someone decides they want Roloson as an insurance policy.

The downside of this is that the Oilers may very well be competing for their division. If they move Roloson, and Garon gets hurt, Jeff Deslauriers and Devan Dubnyk are your tandem. A frightful thought at this juncture of their careers. Personally I have never been a Deslauriers fan but this season he seemed to take a big stride. If the other two perform well, Roloson will be the odd man out and won’t finish the season as an Oiler.

Projection: Back up goalie-trending equal (8 games played 3 wins – 3 loss – 2 OT loss)

JEFF DESLAURIERS

No, I have never been a fan. Ever since the term “Competed hard on a bad team.” was coined for JDD and MA Pouliot, I have hated it. To the point that if the Oilers ever draft a player with that phrase, I will likely discount the pick as a poor one.

The funny thing on the way to the “bust” Deslauriers in the last two seasons seemingly has “got it” more and more. On top of it Deslauriers even impressed enough to gain a two year, one way contract with the Oil. Timing some time is everything. In this case, Deslauriers should be ready for some back up duty this season, and will as soon as the three headed monster is slain.

Projection: Backup to the Backup until he is traded. Trending upwards. (10 games played 4 wins-6 losses)

DEVAN DUBNYK

I can remember looking at the screen in awe when the Oilers took Devan Dubnyk. I knew they needed a goalie, but with their first pick in the first round? They needed Robbie Schremp, the offensive dynamo. (Who knew he would slip to them at 25?) At the time Dubnyk was the 2nd highest rated NA goalie by CSB. As far as curves go, there seem to be a few that look to be passing him,(Cory Schneider who looked great in the Camrose rookie tourney, Kari Rammo for another) but goalies are hard to judge and since he is 22 years old, being the number one guy in the AHL is a decent progression.

Projection: Starting AHL goalie (50 games 26 wins – 20 losses – 4 OT losses)

BRYAN PITTON

Have you ever sat there on draft day, looked over the picks and let the names slip by your eyes like clouds floating by on a windy day? Then, out of nowhere, the name starts doing something, providing some interest where none did before. From what I gather, Pitton had a decent year as a back up for Brampton in his draft year behind Darren Machesney. Goals against weren’t spectacular but his save percentage at least was close to the starter. (That to me is a gauge of a back up. Ultimately if he can keep similar stats to your starter, then he is worth his weight in scheckles.)

Last year he platooned in goal with Patrick Kileen with marginally better stats, but was good enough in the playoffs to earn a three year contract. It is still too early to tell what we have here, but he is good enough to be in the mix at training camp.

Projection: Back up AHL goalie (20 games 9 wins – 7 losses – 4 OT losses)

GLENN FISHER

Fisher isn’t going to be much for this organization. Fisher’s like top end might be an AHL starting goalie sometime in the future, but he would still have to make a big jump to get to that point. He was statistically worse in the ECHL to his platoon mate in Stockton named Tim Boron.

I remember watching Fisher in training camp a couple years ago and seeing a guy that really had some work to do to compete for any kind of NHL job. Would be nice if the hometown boy could do well, but he likely is near his top end already.

Projection: ECHL starting goalie (52 games 20 wins – 25 losses – 7 OT losses)

ANDREW PERUGINI

Jonathan Willis from Copper and Blue likes Perugini better than Pitton. I can’t agree or disagree since I haven’t had any viewings and not much to compare him to. I will go with the premise that since he was passed over in three drafts and doesn’t have an NHL deal, he isn’t ahead of the guy with the contract.

Projection: (EDIT APPARENTLY PERUGINI WILL BE OFFERED A CONTRACT AND COMPETE FOR THE AHL BACK UP JOB) With that knowledge Projection: ECHL/AHL (25 games 12 wins – 10 losses – 3 OT Losses)

The Edmonton Oilers have nice depth in net. It will become better for the team when they decide if and when to move Roloson and allow Deslauriers to get some starts.